x265.ru

**BeMaL** » 07 дек 2014, 09:33

Intel® Atom™ Processor D2700 (1M Cache, 2.13 GHz) - 2 zlhf + ХуперТрединг
http://ark.intel.com/ru/products/59683/ ... Hz?q=d2700

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 32-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 4801.24s (0.23 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 5670.84s (0.20 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 4711.77s (0.24 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 4883.43s (0.23 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Atom D2700 Codename Cedarview Specification Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D2700 @ 2.13GHz Core Stepping B0/B2/B3 Technology 32 nm Stock frequency 2133 MHz Core Speed 2128.0 MHz Northbridge Intel ID0BF3 rev. 03 Southbridge Intel NM10 rev. 02 Memory Type Memory Size 3058 MBytes Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Home Premium Edition 32-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 4) L2 cache 2 x 512 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3 Package (platform ID) Socket FCMBA3 (0x2) Temperature 0 -69°C (-93°F) [0xBA] (TMPIN0) Temperature 1 -69°C (-93°F) [0xBA] (TMPIN1) Temperature 0 52°C (125°F) [0xCB4] (TZ01)

**brik** » 10 дек 2014, 12:12

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 32-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 245.11s (4.60 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 241.66s (4.67 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 241.61s (4.67 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 242.05s (4.66 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 Codename Yorkfield Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz Core Stepping R0 Technology 45 nm Stock frequency 2666 MHz Core Speed 1997.2 MHz FID range 6.0x - 8.0x Northbridge Intel P45/P43/G45/G43 rev. A3 Southbridge Intel 82801JR (ICH10R) rev. 00 CAS# latency (CL) 5.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 5 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 5 Cycle Time (tRAS) 15 Command Rate (CR) 2T Memory Frequency 399.4 MHz (5:6) Memory Type DDR2 Memory Size 3328 MBytes Channels Dual, (Symmetric) Windows Version Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3 (Build 2600) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 4) L2 cache 2 x 3072 KBytes, 12-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T, VT-x Package (platform ID) Socket 775 LGA (0x4) Temperature 0 33°C (91°F) [0x21] (SYSTIN) Temperature 1 56°C (131°F) [0x6F] (CPUTIN) Temperature 2 55°C (130°F) [0x6E] (AUXTIN)

**brik** » 10 дек 2014, 18:54

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 32-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 639.08s (1.77 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 638.70s (1.77 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 638.33s (1.77 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 638.55s (1.77 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Codename Kentsfield Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Core Stepping G0 Technology 65 nm Stock frequency 2400 MHz Core Speed 1603.6 MHz FID range 6.0x - 9.0x Northbridge Intel P35/G33/G31 rev. A2 Southbridge Intel 82801IB (ICH9) rev. 02 CAS# latency (CL) 6.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 6 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 6 Cycle Time (tRAS) 18 Command Rate (CR) 2T Memory Frequency 400.9 MHz (2:3) Memory Type DDR2 Memory Size 2 GBytes Channels Single Windows Version Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3 (Build 2600) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 4) L2 cache 2 x 4096 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T, VT-x Package (platform ID) Socket 775 LGA (0x4) Temperature 0 49°C (120°F) [0x31] (SYSTIN) Temperature 1 51°C (123°F) [0x66] (CPUTIN) Temperature 2 25°C (76°F) [0x32] (AUXTIN)

**zoomer-fodder** » 10 дек 2014, 19:46

i7-3930K @ 4700 HT
16GB DDR3 @ 2400 11-11-11-28 1T Quad

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 54.35s (20.76 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 54.38s (20.74 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 54.39s (20.74 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 54.39s (20.74 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core i7 3930K Name Intel Raid 0 Volume Codename Sandy Bridge-E Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz Core Stepping C2 Technology 32 nm Stock frequency 3200 MHz Core Speed 1202.4 MHz Northbridge Intel Sandy Bridge-E rev. 07 Southbridge Intel X79 rev. 06 CAS# latency (CL) 11.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 11 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 11 Cycle Time (tRAS) 28 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 1202.5 MHz (1:18) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 16324 MBytes Channels Quad Windows Version Microsoft Windows 8.1 (6.3) 64-bit (Build 9600) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 12 Number of threads 12 (max 32) L2 cache 6 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX Package (platform ID) Socket 2011 LGA (0x2) Temperature 0 26°C (78°F) [0x1A] (SYSTIN) Temperature 1 121°C (248°F) [0xF1] (CPUTIN) Temperature 2 45°C (112°F) [0x5A] (AUXTIN) Temperature 3 33°C (91°F) [0x21] (TMPIN3)

А это попадёт в таблицу результатов? Или я зря регистрировался и тестировал?

**zoomer-fodder** » 10 дек 2014, 23:45

i5-3230M @ 3200 HT / 6GB DDR3 1600 C11 Dual:

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 220.98s (5.10 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 220.34s (5.12 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 220.57s (5.11 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 219.27s (5.14 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core i5 3230M Codename Ivy Bridge Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3230M CPU @ 2.60GHz Core Stepping E1/L1 Technology 22 nm Stock frequency 2600 MHz Core Speed 1198.2 MHz Northbridge Intel Ivy Bridge rev. 09 Southbridge Intel HM77 rev. 04 CAS# latency (CL) 11.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 11 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 11 Cycle Time (tRAS) 28 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 798.8 MHz (1:6) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 5984 MBytes Channels Dual Windows Version Microsoft Windows 8.1 (6.3) 64-bit (Build 9600) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 16) L2 cache 2 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AVX Package (platform ID) Socket 988B rPGA (0x4) Temperature 0 58°C (136°F) [0xCF0] (TZS0) Temperature 1 36°C (96°F) [0xC14] (TZS1)

**brik** » 13 дек 2014, 11:46

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 32-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 288.50s (3.91 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 289.62s (3.89 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 288.73s (3.91 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 286.00s (3.94 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 Codename Yorkfield Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz Core Stepping R0 Technology 45 nm Stock frequency 2333 MHz Core Speed 1997.2 MHz FID range 6.0x - 7.0x Northbridge Intel P45/P43/G45/G43 rev. A3 Southbridge Intel 82801JR (ICH10R) rev. 00 CAS# latency (CL) 5.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 5 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 5 Cycle Time (tRAS) 15 Command Rate (CR) 2T Memory Frequency 332.9 MHz (1:1) Memory Type DDR2 Memory Size 3 GBytes Channels Dual, (Symmetric) Windows Version Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3 (Build 2600) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 4) L2 cache 2 x 2048 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T Package (platform ID) Socket 775 LGA (0x4) Temperature 0 43°C (109°F) [0x2B] (SYSTIN) Temperature 1 43°C (109°F) [0x56] (CPUTIN) Temperature 2 9°C (47°F) [0x11] (AUXTIN)

**snayper** » 13 дек 2014, 19:07

спасибо парни, всех добавил.

**zoomer-fodder** » 16 дек 2014, 05:07

snayper писал(а):спасибо парни, всех добавил.

Благодарю, но есть одно НО у 3930к 6 ядер, а не 4

**snayper** » 16 дек 2014, 17:04

zoomer-fodder, да да, исправил.

**brik** » 19 дек 2014, 16:13

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 181.15s (6.23 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 184.33s (6.12 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 184.49s (6.11 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 185.30s (6.09 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core i7 2630QM Codename Sandy Bridge Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2630QM CPU @ 2.00GHz Core Stepping D2 Technology 32 nm Stock frequency 2000 MHz Core Speed 798.2 MHz Northbridge Intel Sandy Bridge rev. 09 Southbridge Intel HM67 rev. B3 CAS# latency (CL) 9.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 9 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 9 Cycle Time (tRAS) 24 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 665.2 MHz (1:5) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 16280 MBytes Channels Dual Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 8 Number of threads 8 (max 16) L2 cache 4 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX Package (platform ID) Socket 988B rPGA (0x4) Temperature 0 87°C (188°F) [0xE12] (TZ00) Temperature 1 87°C (188°F) [0xE12] (TZ01)

**brik** » 26 дек 2014, 18:17

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 232.64s (4.85 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 232.63s (4.85 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 234.31s (4.81 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 232.46s (4.85 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core i5 3210M Codename Ivy Bridge Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz Core Stepping E1/L1 Technology 22 nm Stock frequency 2500 MHz Core Speed 1198.0 MHz Northbridge Intel Ivy Bridge rev. 09 Southbridge Intel HM76 rev. 04 CAS# latency (CL) 11.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 11 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 11 Cycle Time (tRAS) 28 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 798.7 MHz (1:6) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 3982 MBytes Channels Single Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 16) L2 cache 2 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX Package (platform ID) Socket 988B rPGA (0x4) Temperature 0 53°C (127°F) [0xCBE] (THRM) Temperature 1 n.a. (CPU)

**Dantist** » 30 дек 2014, 22:09

Ноутбук, работа от сети, "максимальная производительность", Core i3-2310M .. 3 FPS )))
Причина по которой первый запуск теста оба раза был быстрее последующих мне неизвестна...

64-bit:

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 371.44s (3.04 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 395.43s (2.85 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 399.88s (2.82 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 400.36s (2.82 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core i3 2310M Codename Sandy Bridge Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2310M CPU @ 2.10GHz Core Stepping D2 Technology 32 nm Stock frequency 2100 MHz Core Speed 798.3 MHz Northbridge Intel Sandy Bridge rev. 09 Southbridge Intel HM65 rev. 05 CAS# latency (CL) 9.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 9 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 9 Cycle Time (tRAS) 24 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 665.3 MHz (1:5) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 10184 MBytes Channels Dual Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 16) L2 cache 2 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AVX Package (platform ID) Socket 988B rPGA (0x4) Temperature 0 n.a. [0xAAC] (TZ00)

32-bit:

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 32-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 411.98s (2.74 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 441.43s (2.56 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 444.51s (2.54 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 443.11s (2.55 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core i3 2310M Codename Sandy Bridge Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2310M CPU @ 2.10GHz Core Stepping D2 Technology 32 nm Stock frequency 2100 MHz Core Speed 798.3 MHz Northbridge Intel Sandy Bridge rev. 09 Southbridge Intel HM65 rev. 05 CAS# latency (CL) 9.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 9 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 9 Cycle Time (tRAS) 24 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 665.2 MHz (1:5) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 10184 MBytes Channels Dual Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 16) L2 cache 2 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AVX Package (platform ID) Socket 988B rPGA (0x4) Temperature 0 n.a. [0xAAC] (TZ00) 111

**Dantist** » 31 дек 2014, 00:26

Стационарный ПК, Core 2 Duo E8400, DDR2-800

64-bit:

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 345.76s (3.26 fps), 2266.23 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 346.48s (3.26 fps), 2266.23 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 343.87s (3.28 fps), 2266.23 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 345.29s (3.27 fps), 2266.23 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Codename Wolfdale Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz Core Stepping C0 Technology 45 nm Stock frequency 3000 MHz Core Speed 2001.2 MHz FID range 6.0x - 9.0x Northbridge Intel P35/G33/G31 rev. A2 Southbridge Intel 82801IR (ICH9R) rev. 02 CAS# latency (CL) 5.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 6 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 6 Cycle Time (tRAS) 18 Command Rate (CR) 2T Memory Frequency 400.2 MHz (5:6) Memory Type DDR2 Memory Size 8 GBytes Channels Dual, (Symmetric) Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Enterprise Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 2 Number of threads 2 (max 2) L2 cache 6144 KBytes, 24-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T, VT-x Package (platform ID) Socket 775 LGA (0x0) Temperature 0 33°C (91°F) [0x21] (SYSTIN) Temperature 1 35°C (94°F) [0x46] (CPUTIN)

32-bit:

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 32-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 389.20s (2.90 fps), 2266.23 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 387.33s (2.91 fps), 2266.23 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 390.16s (2.89 fps), 2266.23 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 388.46s (2.90 fps), 2266.23 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Codename Wolfdale Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz Core Stepping C0 Technology 45 nm Stock frequency 3000 MHz Core Speed 2001.2 MHz FID range 6.0x - 9.0x Northbridge Intel P35/G33/G31 rev. A2 Southbridge Intel 82801IR (ICH9R) rev. 02 CAS# latency (CL) 5.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 6 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 6 Cycle Time (tRAS) 18 Command Rate (CR) 2T Memory Frequency 400.2 MHz (5:6) Memory Type DDR2 Memory Size 8 GBytes Channels Dual, (Symmetric) Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Enterprise Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 2 Number of threads 2 (max 2) L2 cache 6144 KBytes, 24-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T, VT-x Package (platform ID) Socket 775 LGA (0x0) Temperature 0 31°C (87°F) [0x1F] (SYSTIN) Temperature 1 28°C (82°F) [0x38] (CPUTIN)

**snayper** » 02 янв 2015, 14:20

спс. добавлено.

**Dantist** » 02 янв 2015, 17:36

BeMaL писал(а):Неттоп Gigabyte GB-BXCEH-2955 - Celeron 2955U, 1.4 ГГц (Haswell-U, потребление 15Вт, реально ваттметром - 4-8 Вт ВСЯ система)
http://ark.intel.com/ru/products/75608/ ... e-1_40-GHz
А неплохо для ПК размером 10*10*3см, висящем где то за монитором на VESA крепеже...

В таблице результатов неправильно записали частоту. Написали 4.5 ГГц вместо 1.4 ГГц

А у меня есть подобная игрушка.
GB-BXBT-1900 ( http://www.gigabyte.com/products/produc ... x?pid=5118 ) потребление по ваттметру - 10W, процессор Celeron J1900, 2.4 ГГц (4 ядра

, Bay Trail-D - ДЕСКТОП)
http://ark.intel.com/ru/products/78867/ ... o-2_42-GHz

По бенчмаркам J1900 должен быть быстрее 2955U примерно на 30%, но x265 их ставит в один ряд.. Все же это бенчмарк не только процессора.. Может еще и из-за того, что у меня 1-канальная DDR3-1333 память..

Intel Celeron J1900, DT, 4 ядра, 2.4 ГГц, DDR3, 1333, 1 канал, 64-бит, 2.40 fps

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data to http://x265.ru/x265-hd-benchmark/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 472.88s (2.39 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 470.15s (2.40 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 470.71s (2.40 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 470.08s (2.40 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Celeron J1900 Codename Bay Trail-D Specification Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz Core Stepping C0 Technology 22 nm Stock frequency 2000 MHz Core Speed 2417.1 MHz Northbridge Intel Bay Trail Host Bridge rev. 0E Southbridge Intel Bay Trail LPC Bridge rev. 0E CAS# latency (CL) 9.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 9 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 9 Cycle Time (tRAS) 24 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 666.8 MHz (1:8) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 3990 MBytes Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Enterprise Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 16) L2 cache 2 x 1024 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x Package (platform ID) Socket 1170 BGA (0x2) Temperature 0 57°C (134°F) [0x39] (TMPIN0) Temperature 1 -69°C (-93°F) [0xBA] (TMPIN1) Temperature 0 27°C (80°F) [0xBB8] (TZ01)

**snayper** » 06 янв 2015, 18:21

Dantist спс, исправил, добавил.

**BeMaL** » 13 янв 2015, 09:16

Процессор CPU Intel Core i5-4430S 2.7 GHz/4core/SVGA HD Graphics4600/1+6Mb/65W/5 GT/s LGA1150

http://www.c3000.ru/price-desc.asp?p=154706

Код: Выделить всё: x265 HD BENCHMARK 0.1.4 RESULTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x265.exe build 1.4+5 x265 Benchmark: 64-bit ========================== CRF-20 preset-"fast" -------------------- encoded 1128 frames in 110.21s (10.23 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 110.32s (10.22 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 110.32s (10.22 fps), 2266.68 kb/s encoded 1128 frames in 112.48s (10.03 fps), 2266.68 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core i5 4430S Codename Haswell Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4430S CPU @ 2.70GHz Core Stepping C0 Technology 22 nm Stock frequency 2700 MHz Core Speed 2793.7 MHz Northbridge Intel Haswell rev. 06 Southbridge Intel H81 rev. C2 CAS# latency (CL) 10.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 10 RAS# Precharge (tRP) 10 Cycle Time (tRAS) 27 Command Rate (CR) 1T Memory Frequency 798.2 MHz (1:6) Memory Type DDR3 Memory Size 16312 MBytes Channels Dual Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Home Premium Edition 64-bit Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 16) L2 cache 4 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3 Package (platform ID) Socket 1150 LGA (0x1) Temperature 0 27°C (80°F) [0x1B] (TMPIN0) Temperature 2 29°C (84°F) [0x1D] (TMPIN2) Temperature 0 28°C (82°F) [0xBC2] (TZ00) Temperature 1 30°C (85°F) [0xBD6] (TZ01)

**BeMaL** » 13 янв 2015, 09:37

Dantist писал(а):По бенчмаркам J1900 должен быть быстрее 2955U примерно на 30%

Нет, не должен. Совсем не должен. Вся технология БайТрейл от Интел, это, увы, чуть ускоренный Атом с дополнительным набором инструкций от старших братьев.
Так что тут как и у атома - высокая частота, много ядер и никакая производительность...
Сравнивая именно эти два процессора - могу сказать что J1900 где то такой же по скорости как 2955U, где то в 2-3(!) раза медленнее...

Вот можете ознакомиться с моим личным наблюдением и стандартным набором тестов...
http://www.c3000.ru/files/TestNettops2014Q4.xls

присутствуют: AMD Barton AMD E350 Atom D2700 AMD Windsor Cel N2815 Cel 847 J1900 2955U 1007U 1037U 1005M AMD A4 5000M i3-3227U AMD A8-5500 AMD A8-6500 AMD A8-7600 i7-4790

**Dantist** » 14 янв 2015, 03:50

Я посмотрел вашу таблицу. Она весьма ценна, кое где для меня удивительна и интересно проверить некоторые моменты лично. Схоронил

Разница в архитектуре присутствует, это понятно и этим легко объясняются некоторые результаты из вашей таблицы. (Почему качели между этими двумя процами то в одну, то в другую сторону)
На многие синтетические тесты из таблицы влияет наличие в системе многоканальной памяти. Этот момент не указан, так что интерпретировать некоторые результаты сложно.

Тем не менее должен заметить, что у вас старое восприятие Атомов.
Да, J1900 это атом под другим названием, но новые атомы очень сильно отличаются от старых..
У меня J1900 в Cinebench R15 выдал 150 баллов.. Как и мой старик Е8400

Туда же и этот рейтинг ( https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php ) который я (и не только) считаю самым адекватным..
Посмотрите, где там J1900..
И посмотрите где там Atom C2750 с TDP 20W.. Рядом с кем он там стоит.. Core 2 Quad, Core-i3, Core-i5...M, Core-i7..U

За атомами закрепилась слава low-end решений, но текущая ситуация иная.

**zub** » 14 янв 2015, 05:05

Вообще, тест скорости в x265 крайне спорный момент.
Например сравнивая [email protected] и i5-3230M, C2Q будет полным аутсайдером, хотя если брать тот-же x264, то скорость все-же в пользу C2Q

Да даже, если брать разные C2D и C2Q, хотя архитектурой они все мальца но схожи, и по итоговой производительности на одинаковое количество ГГц/ядер (в большенстве приложений) у них расхождение не больше 5%, то в x265 результаты скачут словно рубль на бирже ...

p.s. возможно конечно потому, что под коробкой моего C2Q распологаются, два двухядернных кристалла C2D, что делает его нечто подобие 2хЦП компьютера и пока отсутствуют оптимизации под такие вещи т.к. не применяются на практике нынешнего производства цп - http://i.imgur.com/YjvCKuX.jpg

x265.ru

x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark Почему так слабо????

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Re: x265 HD Benchmark

Кто сейчас на форуме